United States v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis
18 F.3d 265 · 1994
Citation profile
46 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably United States v. David (1996), United States v. Retos (1994)
46 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 6050I · 26 U.S.C. § 7203 · 31 U.S.C. § 5311 · 31 U.S.C. § 5313 · 31 U.S.C. § 5322 · 31 U.S.C. § 5324 (§ 1354 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986)
Relies on United States v. Olano · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Burks v. United States · Cheek v. United States · Ratzlaf et Ux United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person willfully violating this subchapter or a regulation prescribed under this subchapter [ 31 U.S.C. Secs. 5311-5328 ] ... shall be fined not more than $250,000, or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Willful means no more than the Defendant charged with the duty knows what he is doing. It does not mean, in addition, he must suppose he is breaking the law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that th[e] failure to give an instruction on a required element of the crime is an error that affects substantial rights”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.