Highsmith v. Chrysler Credit Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
18 F.3d 434 · 1994
Citation profile
37 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably 166 Ill. 2d 72 - Hermitage Corp. v. Contractors Adjustment Co. (1995), Peso Chavez v. The Illinois State Police (2001)
37 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1307 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 15 U.S.C. § 1637 (§ 127 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1667A (§ 182 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1667B (§ 183 of the Truth in Lending Act)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Allen v. Wright · Aetna Life Ins Co of Hartford Conn v. Haworth · Whitmore v. Arkansas · Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[t]his rule is necessary to give plaintiffs the benefit of the broad standard for surviving a Rule 12(b)(6) motion . . . .'”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Additionally, the Highsmiths, as well as Mr. Villasenor, allege that the lease provisions violate the Michigan Consumer Protection Act. Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 445.901-922 (1989). The district court dismissed these claims as against all plaintiffs. For the reasons stated in the district court opinion, 150 B.R. 997, 1007-08 (N.D.Ill.1993), we affirm that ruling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether he should terminate his lease early.... If the formula disclosed is inaccurate, either too high or too low, the lessee will be unable to assess the true costs of termination and unable to make a truly rational decision.” Id. The Appellate Court noted, however, that Section 1667a(ll) is not violated when a lessor”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.