Riley v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis
18 F.3d 619 · 1994
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 12 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Ngure v. Ashcroft (2004), Prosch v. Apfel (2000)
26 federal appellate · 12 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Bowen v. Yuckert · Browning v. Sullivan · Woolf v. Shalala · Thomas v. Sullivan · Nelson v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, including the new evidence submitted after the determination was made.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[The court] must speculate to some extent on how the administrative law judge would have weighed the newly submitted reports if they had been available for the original hearing.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“first, that the Appeals Council improperly failed to consider [newly submitted evidence in the form of medical reports] and, second, that even if the Appeals Council considered them, it wrongly concluded that they provided no basis for a grant of review of the administrative law judge's decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.