United States v. Reyes’s Empirical Analysis
18 F.3d 65 · 1994
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably United States v. Wong (1994), United States v. Dukagjini (2002)
36 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · In re Martin-Trigona · Associated Grocers, Inc. v. Washington · Rauer v. United States · Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Shugrue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Testimony containing hearsay may be admissible not for its truth but as background information if (1) 'the non-hearsay purpose by which the evidence is sought to be justified is relevant,' and (2) 'the proba tive value of this evidence for its non-hearsay purpose is [not] outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice resulting from the impermissible hearsay use of the declarant's statement.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the jury [was] likely to consider the statement for the truth of what was stated with significant resultant prejudice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Hearsay is evidence of a declarant's out-of-court statement to prove the truth of what is asserted in the statement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.