United States v. Gottesfeld’s Empirical Analysis
2021
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 28 U.S.C. § 144 · 28 U.S.C. § 455
Relies on United States v. Leon · Liteky et al United States · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Waller v. Georgia · Press-Enterprise Company v. Superior Court of California Riverside County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a defendant can waive or forfeit a claim of error in the application of the Act by failing to timely raise the claim in the district court,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“we need not decide what standard of review applies because we see no error, plain or - 24 - otherwise, in the district court's decision”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.