Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

18 F. App'x 441

Michael Jacobson v. Ann Veneman

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 4, 2001

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-09-04

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2002

Relies on Noland v. United States Civil Service Commission · Jaunich v. United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-09-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Michael Jacobson petitions this court for review of the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) decision not to hold a referendum on its beef checkoff program. Because we lack jurisdiction to review the USDA’s decision, we dismiss the petition without prejudice.

¶2 Absent a statutory provision conferring jurisdiction upon the courts of appeals, the district courts have exclusive jurisdiction to review those agency decisions subject to judicial review. See Jaunich v. United States Commodity Futures Trading Comm’n, 50 F.3d 518, 520 (8th Cir.1995); Noland v. United States Civil Serv. Comm’n, 544 F.2d 333, 334 (8th Cir.1976) (per curiam). The Beef Promotion and Research Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 2901-2911, which governs the beef checkoff program, does not include such a grant of jurisdiction.

¶3 Accordingly, we dismiss the petition without prejudice.

/18/fappx/441 · .json · Public domain