Bertsch v. Canterbury’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2019
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on in the Matter of W P Connaway Receiver of the Moscow National Bank of Moscow Idaho · 92 F. Supp. 20 - Commercial Solvents Corporation v. Jasspon · Luster v. Martin · Marinovich v. United States · Plimpton v. Mattakeunk Cabin Colony, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that if in personam jurisdiction has been previously acquired of the original party, then the in personam jurisdiction continues over the substituted party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.