Uarco Inc. v. Lam’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
8 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2022
8 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Van Dusen v. Barrack · Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League · Miller National Labor Relations Board v. California Pacific Medical Center · Chalk v. United States District Court Central District of California · Aydin Corporation v. Loral Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he loss of clients and market share is not economic loss that can be fully compensated by a damage award,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“`all of the rights, privileges, immunities, and franchises.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.