18 F. Supp. 3d 67 - Burns v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White · Monge v. California · Brown v. General Services Administration · Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth · Bush v. Lucas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“can also mean that the defendant harassed the plaintiff based on ... her gender and thereby created a gender-based hostile work environment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]t can mean that the defendant took a discrete, adverse employment action against the plaintiff because of his or her gender.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.