Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

18 Ga. App. 265

Ray v. Chuce

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 23, 1916

Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1916-06-23

<p>Certiorari; from Jackson superior court — Judge Brand. May 8, 1915.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1916-06-23

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1961

3 state decisions

10191619201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Broyles, J.

¶1Section 5185 of the Civil Code of 1910 requires that before any writ of certiorari shall issue, the party applying for the same, his agent or attorney, shall produce a certificate, from the officer whose decision or judgment is the subject-matter of complaint, that all costs which may have accrued on the trial below have been paid. The plaintiff in error lost his suit in the city court of Jefferson, and carried his case by certiorari to the superior court. The certificate attached to the petition for certiorari, that all costs which had accrued on the trial below had been paid, was not made by the judge of the city court of Jefferson, but was made by the clerk of that court. A motion to dismiss the certiorari on this ground was sustained in the superior court. Under the ruling in Davis v. Joiner, 1 Ca. App. 106 (58 S. E. 62), the certiorari was properly dismissed.

¶2(a) There is nothing in the act creating the city court of Jefferson to vary the statutory requirement as to' the certification referred to above, even if the legislature could legally and constitutionally provide, in an act creating a city court, a method different from the general rule as provided in section 5185 of the Civil Code. Judgment affirmed.

/18/gaapp/265 · .json · Public domain