18 Ga. App. 83
Lythgoe v. Carson
Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1916-05-18
<p>" Complaint; from city court of hTewnan — Judge Post. July 28, 1915.</p> <p>In the case of Carson against Lythgoe the trial judge refused to open a default, directed a verdict against the defendant, and entefed judgment thereon; all of which is complained of in the bill of exceptions. The motion to dismiss the writ of error is based on the ground that after the case had been disposed of in the trial court as stated above, and before the bill of exceptions was signed, the plaintiff in error filed a suit against Carson, the defendant in error, which is still pending, based upon the same cause of action that the plaintiff in error had sought to set up in his proposed answer to the former suit, and that this amounted to an acquiescence in the rulings and judgment complained of in the bill of exceptions, and therefore the questions presented therein are moot questions. On this motion the following cases were cited: Randolph v. Brunswick & Birmingham R. Co., 120 Ga. 969; Brown v. Atlanta, 123 Ga. 491; Seaboard, Air-Line Ry. v. Randolph, 126 Ga. 245 (4).</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1927
1 state decisions
Relies on 1 Ga. App. 332 - Brawner v. Maddox · Coker v. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. · Randolph v. Brunswick & Birmingham Railroad
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1916-05-18