Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

18 How. Pr. 168

Vence v. Speir

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided December 15, 1859

The Superior Court of New York City · decided 1859-12-15

<p>Witnesses, who attend the trial by request (without subpoena), in two causes, are .entitled to the full allowance of fees in each case, though the parties may be the same.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1859-12-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1891

3 state decisions

1018591860187018801890decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Slosson, Justice.

¶1Witnesses, who come from a distance at the request of parties, without subpoena, are entitled to the allowance for travelling expenses, and to the per-diem allowance provided by statute; but the per-diem allowance is to be restricted to the days during which the case is actually on the day calendar of the court sitting for trials, and actually in session, and the witnesses are in attendance. If they attend on the like request in two causes, they are entitled to the full allowance in each case, though the parties may be same. (19 Wendell, 82 ; 12 How. 446 ; 4 Sand. 719 ; 16 How. 306; 2 R. S., 5th ed., 922, § 24.)

¶2Referred back to the clerk for retaxation.

/18/howpr/168 · .json · Public domain