¶1I have looked over this opinion (of Judge Brown at special term), and the briefs of counsel with some cáre, and am inclined to think the question is settled upon authority in favor of the conclusion at which Judge Brown arrives, and, therefore, whatever might be our opinion of the case as an original question, the order of the special term should be affirmed.
18 How. Pr. 89
Freligh v. Brink
Decided September 15, 1858
New York Supreme Court · decided 1858-09-15
Jeremiah Russell, a judgment-creditor of the defendants, Brink and Snider, moves to set aside the judgment entered by confession in this action for the insufficiency of the statement, which is in the following words: “ The above indebtedness arose on a promissory note, made by the defendants to the plaintiff, dated June 21st, 1854, in the sum of seven hundred dollars with interest; that amount of money being had by the defendants of the plaintiff, and upon which there is…
Decided 1858-09-15