Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 Ill. App. 2d 225 - Dworak v. Tempel

18 Ill. App. 2d 225 - Dworak v. Tempel’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
4
states following
December 1998
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 1998

3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

8019581960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 4 Ill. 2d 273 - Geneva Construction Co. v. Martin Transfer & Storage Co. · McLaughlin v. the People · 334 Ill. App. 579 - Economy Auto Insurance v. Brown · Smith v. Clavey Ravinia Nurseries Inc. · 9 Ill. App. 2d 545 - New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Gerin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When the Legislature revises a statute it must be presumed that the Legislature took cognizance of the prior decisions of the courts construing and interpreting the prior law. If, after a statute has been construed and interpreted, the Legislature makes radical changes in phraseology, an intention is thereby shown to establish a rule different from that announced by the courts.” (Dworak v. Tempel (1958), 18 Ill. App. 2d 225, 230 , affd (1959), 17 Ill. 2d 181 , citing McLaughlin v. People (1949), 403 Ill. 493 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Where the indemnity feature is not present, i.e., life or accident insurance, the subrogation feature has no application.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.