Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

18 Ind. 176

Simonds v. Buford

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1862

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1862-05-15

<p>A notice of intention to hold a lien for materials furnished, is suffi cient if it state the amount, to whom, from whom, and for what due, and describe the premises upon which the lien is contemplated.</p> <p>"Where materials were furnished to, and a lien claimed against, an unmarried man, who afterwards died without issue, his heirs are proper parties defendants to an action to enforce the lien.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1862-05-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1952

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

201862187018801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1A notice of intention to hold a lien for materials furnished, would appear to be sufficient, when it states the amount, to whom,-by whom, and for what due, and the premises upon which the lien is contemplated.

¶2"Where materials were furnished to an unmarried man, and proceedings are instituted after his death without issue, in the absence of any grant of administration, his heirs were prop*177erly made defendants. The judgment is reversed, with costs, and cause remanded.

Andrew H. Evans and John H. Gould, for appellants.L. Chamberlain, for appellees.
/18/ind/176 · .json · Public domain