Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 Ind. 21 - Proctor v. Owens

Proctor v. Owens’s Empirical Analysis

1862

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
June 1908
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 1908

13 state decisions

5018621870188018901900decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Guard v. Risk · Drummond v. Leslie · Ausman v. Veal · Shields v. Cunningham · Smawley v. Stark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ The words proven being actionable in themselves, the defendant was not injured by proof that the witness understood them in an actionable sense. Hence, we need not decide whether the testimony was admissible, the error, if error was committed, being harmless.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.