Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

18 Ind. 306

Klussman v. Copeland

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1862

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1862-05-15

<p>It is unnecessary, in an action on a note against the survivor of several maters, to join either the heirs or representatives of the deceased maters.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1901

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1862-05-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The only question in this case is,, whether the heirs or representatives, or both, of a deceased maker of a *307joint promissory note should be joined in an action against the survivor. Ye do not think such joinder is required.

Chandler § Hynes, for the appellant.Jas. H. Blythe, for the appellee.

¶2The judgment is affirmed with costs.

/18/ind/306 · .json · Public domain