Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

18 Ind. 438

State ex rel. Long v. Long

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1862

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1862-05-15

<p>No appeal lies in behalf of the State or the relator, from the judgment of a justice of the peace, in a prosecution for surety of the peace.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1924

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1862-05-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Davison, J.

¶1James Long, the relator, on complaint before a justice of the peace, prayed surety of the peace against Daniel Long. The justice, upon final hearing, discharged the defendant from the prosecution, and gave judgment against the relator for the costs of suit. Prom that judgment he appealed. In the Common Pleas the defendant moved to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that, in such cases, no appeal lies from the judgment of a justice. The Court sustained the motion, and the appeal was accordingly dismissed. Was this ruling correct ?

¶2The statute which prescribes the mode of proceeding in cases of “ surety of the peace,” does not authorize an appeal, by the State or the relator. And the general statute regulating appeals from the judgment of justices, in criminal cases, allows the defendant, but not the State, to appeal to the Common Pleas. 2 R. S. pp. 498, 500, 501. In the absence of any *439statutory provision allowing the appeal in question, we must hold that it was correctly dismissed.

LaRue § Royse, for the appellant.Per Curiam.

¶3The judgment is affirmed, with eosts.

/18/ind/438 · .json · Public domain