Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 INDAPP 392 - Gates v. Newman

Gates v. Newman’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
5
states following
August 1973
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 1973

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

90189719001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cromwell v. County of Sac · Reynolds v. Stockton · Grover Baker Co v. Radcliffe · Fischli v. Fischli · Green v. Glynn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Thus it is held that “pending” applies to a judgment on which successive fieri facias venditionis have been issued, but not fully satisfied, and that although judgment has been recovered, the action is pending as long as the judgment remains unsatisfied.” (Cases cited.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.