Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 INDAPP 466 - Taylor v. Reger

Taylor v. Reger’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2007

11 state decisions

40189719001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hays v. Crutcher · McClellan v. Robe · Barnett v. Juday · Brunswick-Balke Collender Co. v. Boutell · Kelso v. Kelso

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When the corporate name of Pendleton Window Glass Company had been subscribed to the note in suit, by ‘B. F. Aiman, President,’ such signature bound the corporation, and the signing of the names of the appellants, as directors, added no force or effect to it. Under the circumstances, we must regard the word ‘Directors,’ opposite the names of the appellants, as merely descriptio personae”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.