Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

18 Johns. 22

Camp v. Root

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1820

New York Supreme Court · decided 1820-05-15

County.; Root brought an action of Replevin against Camp and Clar/r,. administrators, &c. in which the defendants. avowed a taking for rent, &c. The plaintiffs pleaded in . ‘ 1 r bar to the avo\fries 5 to which pleas there was a demurrer . . . . , . . , _ . joinder.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1820-05-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1915

7 state decisions

201820183018401850186018701880189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1This is plainly a case of submission to arbitration ; it is, in no respect, a reference under the statute. The parties chose to enter their submission upon the minutes of the Court, and to direct the arbitrator to make report to the Court; but all this does not vary the rights of the parties, nor authorize the Court to give judgment immediately on the award.

¶2The submission to arbitration was a discontinuance of the suit.

¶3In the case of Yates v. Russell, in the Court of Errors, (a) it was expressly stipulated by the attorney for the defendant, that if the referees reported against him, judgment should be entered against him for the sum so reported. And that was considered equivalent to a plea of confession for that amount. But in this case there is no such stipulation. We are, therefore, of opinion, that Mr. Bacon’s report is to be regarded as an award merely; and that the judgment thus summarily entered upon it was erroneous.

¶4judgment of reversal.

¶5Vide 17 Johns. Rep. 461.

/18/johns/22 · .json · Public domain