Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 KAN 104 - Schmucker v. Sibert

Schmucker v. Sibert’s Empirical Analysis

1877

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
19
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2006 · most notably 58 Cal. 2d 528 - Amen v. Merced County Title Co. (1962), Scott v. Hickman (1884)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 60 state decisions — followed in 19 states

15018771880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lawrence v. . Fox · Lord v. Morris · Grattan v. Wiggins · Wood v. Goodfellow · McCarthy v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The acceptance of the deed makes it a contract in writing binding upon the grantee, just as the acceptance by a lessee of a lease in writing signed by only the lessor, makes it a written contract binding upon such lessee ; and suit can be instituted upon it, and the same rights maintained, as though it were also signed by the grantee.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““We are aware of the fact that in some states a distinction is drawn between the note and mortgage, and that a foreclosure of the latter may be barred even when a recovery on the note is not. And this in states such as California, where the note is the principal thing, and the mortgage only a security for the note.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““As soon as the note is barred the mortgage is also barred; and a grantee of the mortgagor may interpose this defense to an action to foreclose the mortgage, whether the mortgagor does or not.” (Syl. H 3.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.