Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 Kan. App. 2d 890 - State v. Vargas

18 Kan. App. 2d 890 - State v. Vargas’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 1994
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Prouse · State v. Cheun-Phon Ji · State v. Crawford · State v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In Crawford , the Supreme Court permitted a defendant to waive consideration of sentencing factors made mandatory by statute. We see no discernible difference in holding a defendant may also waive consideration of a presumptive sentence provided by statute. We hold that when a defendant enters into a plea agreement and asks for and receives the bargained-for sentence, he or she has waived any consideration or application by the trial court of the presumptive sentence set forth in K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 21-4606b. In these circumstances, State v. Crawford controls, and State v. Turner is not applicable.” Vargas, 18 Kan. App. 2d at 894 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.