¶1There were other points in the case, but the Court were of opinion, that the facts did not show an actual occupying within *395the meaning of the statute, and the defendant was accordingly-discharged.
¶2Dunlap, for the defendant.
¶3 See Commonwealth v. Bolkom, 3 Pick. 281; Commonwealth v. Arnold, 4 Pick. 251; Commonwealth v. Estabrook, 10 Pick. 293.