¶1The assignment gave Reed only an equitable interest in the note, the legal property still remaining in the plaintiff. The assignor, with the consent of the assignee, may maintain this action.
¶2Judgment according to the verdict.
¶3See Gibbs v. Merrill, 3 Taunt. 307; Tuttle v Cooper, 10 Pick. 282 287 Burgess v. Merrill, 4 Tax Tt. 468.