Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 MASSAPPCT 950 - Cole v. Pulley

Cole v. Pulley’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2013

7 state decisions

401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 541

Relies on Segal v. Rochelle · 16 Mass. App. Ct. 36 - Buker v. NATIONAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION · Pilos v. First National Stores Inc. · Della Jacova v. Widett · Patelle v. Planning Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Unless scheduled by the debtor (the plaintiff here did not do so) and abandoned by the trustee ..., such rights of action may not thereafter be pursued by the debtor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.