Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 Md. App. 266 - King v. State

18 Md. App. 266 - King v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1976
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wade · Simmons v. United States · Stovall v. Denno · Gilbert v. California · 12 Md. App. 684 - Walker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * that the rule to be followed with regard to photographic identifications is that if it is shown that a pretrial identification by photograph, on the totality of the circumstances surrounding it, was so unduly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification, the admission of evidence of such identification or a subsequent in-court identification is determined pursuant to the exclusionary rules * * *.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.