18 Md. App. 571 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on JOHNSON, ETC. v. State · People v. . McQuade · Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Montgomery · 15 Md. App. 478 - Peterson v. State · 12 Md. App. 449 - Mills v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We must give consideration to the fact that the lower court in the trial setting is in a much better position to assess the prejudicial effect, if any, of the occurrence prompting the motion.” See also, Wilhelm v. State, supra at 429: (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.