¶1The order of March 13, 1959 should be affirmed, ■with $10 costs. No opinion.
¶2The order of March 16, 1959 should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $10 costs to the defendant Katz and the matter remitted to the Municipal Court to determine on oral proof whether defendant-appellant was served with process.
¶3Defendant-appellant is entitled to a hearing to determine whether he was served with process.
¶4Order affirmed, etc.