Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

18 Mo. 13

Bryson & Hardin v. Penix

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1853

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1853-03-15

This was an action commenced by Bryson and Hardin against Penix and the administrator o£ James M. Parks, to recover the amount of four notes executed by Parks, in his life-time, and secured by a mortgage on certain beef cattle. The administrators of Henry Early were subsequently made parties defendants.

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““Our statute prescribes no time witbin which a deed or conveyance shall be recorded. Under such circumstances a party must have a reasonable time for that purpose, which is to be determined from the circumstances of each case; and when a deed is recorded within a reasonable time it has relation back to the time of execution.””

quoted by 1 later decision, including First Nat. Bank of Buchanan County v. Connett

Relies on Cook v. Clippard

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1853-03-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 1959 · most notably First Nat. Bank of Buchanan County v. Connett (1905), Hughes v. Menefee (1888)

4 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

7018531860187018801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Scott, Judge,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶21. The eighth section of our act, concerning fraudulent conveyances, is a transcript of a similar provision in the Massachusetts code. Code of 1836, p. 473, sec. 5. Under that statute it has been held, that when personal property is mortgaged without a delivery thereof to the mortgagee, and the mortgage is not recorded, a party who buys the property of the mortgagor and takes possession of it, though he has knowledge of the mortgage, will hold the property against the mortgagee. Travis v. Bishop, 13 Met.

¶3So, in the case of Cook v. Clifford, 12 Mo. 379, under the fifth section of our act concerning fraudulent conveyances, it was held, that the purchaser of a slave from a loanee, who had had five years possession, would hold him against the lender, although he had full knowledge of the circumstances.

¶4It is very true, that the recording of a mortgage or dbéd' of trust, does not prevent its being assailed for fraud, but there is no evidence of fraud in this case but the purchasing with notice of the prior unrecorded deed, and, as that is warranted by law, it cannot be regarded as a fraud.

¶52. Our statute prescribes no time within which a deed or conveyance shall be recorded. Under such circumstances, a *16party must have a reasonable time for that purpose, which is to be determined from the circumstances of each case ; and when a deed is recorded within a reasonable time, it has relation back to the time of execution. 4 Kent, 458. The question, whether the deed, in the present case, was recorded in a reasonable time, was not raised in the court below, nor was any evidence preserved in relation to it, except the mere dates of the respective deeds. The other judges concurring, the judgment will be affirmed.

/18/mo/13 · .json · Public domain