Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 N.C. App. 606 - State v. Johnson

18 N.C. App. 606 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2012

12 state decisions

4019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Strickland · 39 Mich. App. 126 - People v. Heading · Williams v. State · State v. . Matthews · Joyner v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) testimony that the motion picture or videotape fairly and accurately illustrates the events filmed (illustrative purposes); (2) ‘proper testimony concerning the checking and operation of the video camera and the chain of evidence concerning the videotape ...’; (3) testimony that ‘the photographs introduced at trial were the same as those [the witness] had inspected immediately after processing,’ (substantive purposes); or (4) ‘testimony that the videotape had not been edited, and that the picture fairly and accurately recorded the actual appearance of the area “photographed.” ’ ””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.