State v. Haines’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably State v. Lucas (1959), State v. Culver (1957)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Philadelphia National Bank · Brown v. State of Mississippi · Winberry v. Salisbury · Willner v. Committee on Character & Fitness · United States v. Smyth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In repealing Titles 2 and 3 and enacting Titles 2A and 3A the Legislature was stripping the statute book of procedural matters. As we said in State v. Otis Elevator Co., 12 N.J. 1, 18 (1953): “Sensing the undesirability of the comingling of substantive and procedural law in Title 2 of the Revised Statutes dealing with the administration of civil and criminal justice and in Title 3 dealing with the administration of estates, the Legislature in June 1950 appointed an Advisory Committee on the Revision of Statutes (L. 1950, c. 171) to revise these two titles * * * and to delete the procedural matter therein, and on December 5, 1951 it enacted the recommendations of its Advisory Committee as Titles 2A and 3A of the Revised Statutes (L. 1951, cc. 344, 345).” [ 18 N.J. at 558 ],”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Farlow“that the grand jury is an arm of the court, the proceedings by it are to be regarded as proceedings in the court, and that contempts in the presence of the grand jury are to be treated as taking place in the presence of the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“we run the risk of rendering the grand jury powerless to indict without specific express authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.