In re El’s Empirical Analysis
1940
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 1961
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is no provision that the total disability must occur simultaneously with the `subsequent permanent injury' nor that it shall occur `immediately thereafter.' Such a limitation would be illogical, for we know by common knowledge and experience that the effects of traumatic injuries are not to be reliably gauged by manifestations evinced simultaneously with the accident, or `immediately thereafter.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ratsch v. Holderman“totally disabled as a result of experiencing a subsequent permanent injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ratsch v. Holderman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.