Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 NM 377 - Crane v. Cox

Crane v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2016

9 state decisions

3019131920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sturges v. Carter · Rich v. Flanders · Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. State ex rel. City of Omaha · Albuquerque Bank v. Perea · Gladney v. Sydnor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Chapter 84, Laws 1913, went into effect immediately upon its approval, March 18, 1913, and as it expressly repealed chapter 22, Laws 1899, it provides the only procedure for the sale of property for delinquent taxes.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.