Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

18 N.M. 44

Murry v. Daughtry

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1913

New Mexico Supreme Court · decided 1913-01-09

<p>SYLLABUS (BY THE COURT)</p> <p>A motion for dismissal not supported by brief or argument will not be considered by this court.</p>

Decided 1913-01-09

¶1OPINION OP THE COURT.

HANNA, J. —

¶2There are two. motions, for our consideration, for the dismissal of the appeal, raising substantially the same questions. The grounds assigned in support of the motion for a dismissal as to the appellant, Clara Murry, are all incorporated in the motion for' dismissal as to the appellant, Sarah Jane Murry, which, however, incorporates additional grounds. Neither of these motions are supported by brief or argument.

¶3We are disposed to believe that motions not deemed worthy of argument are so lightly considered by the party presenting same, that our time should not be consumed by an investigation into their merits.

¶4For the reasons stated the motions are overruled.

/18/nm/44 · .json · Public domain