Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 NY2D 516 - People v. Jackson

People v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on People v. Nitzberg · People v. . Sweeney · People v. . Huson · Lapier v. . Gonyo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is unfortunate that, at this stage of the proceedings, after a conviction has been properly obtained on sufficient evi dence, the indictment must be dismissed because of the District Attorney’s failure to present sufficient evidence to the Grand Jury. Nevertheless, the indictment is invalid, and consequently any subsequent proceedings resting thereon are similarly invalid.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.