Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

18 N.Y.3d 839

People v. Walker

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 2011

New York Court of Appeals · decided 2011-12-20

Decided 2011-12-20

¶1OPINION OF THE COURT

¶2On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order *840modified and case remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, for further proceedings, and as so modified, affirmed. We conclude that on this record defendant satisfied his burden of showing that a reconstruction hearing is necessary to determine whether he was present during the Sandoval hearing. Upon remittal, if it is determined that defendant was not present during the Sandoval hearing, a new trial must be ordered; if it is determined that defendant was present, the judgment of conviction should be amended to reflect that result.

¶3Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Cipajrick, Gbaffeo, Read, Smith and Jones. Taking no part: Judge Pigott.

/18/ny3d/839 · .json · Public domain