¶1I concur in result. There was no question for the jury upon the question of probable cause. That question depended upon the information which Corwin had before he acted. There was no dispute in respect to that, and consequently the question of probable cause was one for the court, and not the jury.
18 N.Y.S. 215
Farrell v. Friedlander
Decided February 18, 1892
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1971
1 federal appellate ·
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Reversed · Decided 1892-02-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →