Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 Ohio App. 3d 88 - Finomore v. Epstein

18 Ohio App. 3d 88 - Finomore v. Epstein’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
2
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably 37 Ohio App. 3d 78 - Stegawski v. Cleveland Anesthesia Group, Inc. (1987), 138 Ohio App. 3d 801 - Fontbank, Inc. v. Compuserve, Incorporated (2000)

4 federal appellate · 58 state decisions

31019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miles v. Perpetual Savings & Loan Co. · 4 Ohio App. 3d 164 - Foust v. Valleybrook Realty Co. · Walters v. First National Bank · 68 Ohio App. 2d 255 - Friedland v. Lipman · 41 Ohio App. 2d 118 - Klott v. Associates Real Estate

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “consider[ing] the various circumstances involved, such as the nature of the transaction, the form and materiality of the representation, the relationship of the parties, the respective intelligence, experience, age, and mental and physical condition of the parties, and their respective knowledge and means of knowledge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Since all of the adversities regarding title to the properties were of public record and therefore easily discoverable, appellee had no right to rely upon any alleged oral misrepresentations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “prohibits the admission of testimony regarding prior or contemporaneous oral agreements which contradict or vary the terms of written agreements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.