State v. Ferrette’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably State v. Lott (1990), 136 Ohio App. 3d 599 - Rohrbaugh v. Rohrbaugh (2000)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Dehass · State v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Forgery” and “uttering” are defined in R.C. 2913.01 as: “(G) ‘Forge’ means to fabricate or create, in whole or in part and by any means, any spurious writing, or to make, execute, alter, complete, reproduce, or otherwise purport to authenticate any writing, when such writing in fact is not authenticated thereby. “(H) ‘Utter’ means to issue, publish, transfer, use, put or send into circulation, deliver, or display.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A law enforcement officer is considered to be someone who has a statutory duty to enforce the laws of Ohio and who is vested by statute with the power to arrest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.