State v. Boyd’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably City of Columbus v. Taylor (1988), 75 Ohio App. 3d 63 - State v. Jenkins (1991)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Nolton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to sustain a conviction under R.C. 4511.19 (A)(3), there must be proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was operating a vehicle within this state and that at the time he had a concentration of ten-hundredths of one gram or more by weight of alcohol per two hundred ten liters of his breath. The relevant evidence is limited to that evidence having any tendency to make the existence of either or both of these facts more probable or less probable.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"(a) Operation Generally. No person shall operate any vehicle within the Municipality, if any of the following apply: “(1) The person is under the influence of alcohol, a drug of abuse, or alcohol and a drug of abuse; "(2) The person has a concentration of ten-hundredths of one percent (0.10%) or more by weight of alcohol in his blood; “(3) The person has a concentration of ten-hundredths of one percent (0.10) of one gram or more by weight of alcohol per 210 liters of his breath; “(4) The person has a concentration of fourteen-hundredths (0.14) of one gram or more by weight of alcohol per 100 milliliters of his urine. (ORC 4511.19)’’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“standing alone, appellee's appearance, manner of speech and walking, and lack of any symptoms of intoxication are not relevant evidence and, therefore, not admissible”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Simmons
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.