Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 OR 126 - Hicklin v. McClear

Hicklin v. McClear’s Empirical Analysis

1889

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
4
states following
December 1949
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 1949 · most notably Heitz v. City of St. Louis (1892), Franklin v. Northrup (1923)

2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

1101889189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Meier v. Portland Cable Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whether or not that court was justified by the weight of evidence in making the findings, this court cannot consider. Nor can it consider any failure or neglect on the part of the circuit court to make other findings from the evidence before it, which would be material in the case, unless the point is specially made and brought here. If the findings of the circuit court in such a case are wholly unsupported by the evidence, and that fact is made to appear by a bill of exceptions purporting to contain all the evidence upon the point, this court would disregard the findings. And should the circuit court fail or neglect to make a material finding upon the evidence before it, and the bill of exceptions showed that the court was specially requested to make the finding, and it had refused to do so, this court would doubtless deem an exception to such refusal well taken. I am induced to make these suggestions because they involve an important point in practice, to which the attention of the profession should be called.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.