Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 OR 256 - State v. Jones

State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1889

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 1931
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 1931

11 state decisions

50188918901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““where the state proves enough to require the defendant to produce evidence in his own behalf such a direction would be improper. As soon as enough is shown to require the defendant to enter upon his defense and to introduce evidence, it is the province of the jury to weigh the evidence and to pass upon the credibility of the witnesses. A direction to acquit in such a case would be an invasion of the province of the jurv, and could not be sustained.” State v. Jones, 18 Or. 256, 260 ( 22 Pac. 840 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.