¶1Opinion by
¶2On March 26, 1971, the appellee, Paul E. Bachman, was apprehended and charged with operating a motor vehicle while his operating privileges were suspended in violation of Section 624(6) of The Vehicle Code, Act of April 29, 1959, P.L. 58, as amended, 75 P.S. §624(6). On June 9, 1972, he was convicted of this offense, then denominated a misdemeanor.
¶3That Mr. Bachman violated the statute is not disputed. The lower court’s action was based on (1) a finding that Mr. Bachman’s operation of the motor vehicle was “inadvertent,” (2) the Court’s belief that a one year’s suspension would work an economic hardship, and *262(3) the Court’s conclusion that the imposition of a one year’s suspension was an abuse of the Secretary’s discretion because the Legislature had changed the classification of the offense from misdemeanor to one punishable in summary proceedings.
¶4Our opinion in Commonwealth v. Bensing, 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 71, 315 A.2d 897 (1974) is controlling. There, Judge WILKINSON noted that no one may regard driving during a suspension, after surrendering an operator’s license, as inadvertent.
¶5Order
¶6And Now, this 2nd day of April, 1975, the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Snyder County is reversed and the Order of suspension imposed by the Secretary of Transportation is reinstated. A reinstated suspension shall be issued by the Secretary of Transportation within 30 days.
¶7. By the Act of May 26, 1972, P.L. 313, 75 P.S. §624 (Supp. 1974-1975) effective July 25, 1972, the offense of violation of Section 624(6) was reclassified a summary offense.
¶8. Mr. Bachman had driven 65 miles immediately before his apprehension.