Harris v. Kaulius’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2019
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Malakoff v. Zambar, Inc. · 161 Pa. Super. 456 - Polis v. Russell · 268 Pa. Super. 383 - Commonwealth v. Orman · 221 Pa. Super. 8 - Roselon Industries, Inc. v. Associated Knitting Mills
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We agree with defendant that the notation of the postal authorities, to the effect that the letter was “unclaimed,” as opposed to “refused,” is insufficient to authorize service by ordinary mail pursuant to the cited rule. While a refusal to accept the letter may constitute sufficient evidence of service, we believe that a mere failure to claim a letter cannot be treated in the same fashion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.