18 So. 3d 1016 - Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 37 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[ujnder both the Fourth Amendment and the Florida wiretapping act, a speaker must have an actual subjective expectation of privacy and our society must recognize that the expectation is reasonable for the oral conversation to be protected. See Smith, 641 So.2d at 852 . Thus, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a police vehicle or in a telephone communication from jail during which warnings are issued; therefore, any interception of conversations that occur there would not be prohibited by chapter 943.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. Jackson v. State

2. “If the State presents direct evidence, which the State did here, the trial court’s determination will be affirmed if the record, viewed in the light most favorable to the State, contains competent, substantial evidence supporting each element of the offenses.... The trial court should not grant a motion for judgment of acquittal “unless the evidence is such that no view which the jury may lawfully take of it favorable to the opposite party can be sustained under the law.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 41 So. 3d 1004 - Jacobs v. State

3. “Jackson has not contested the eight aggravating circumstances found by the trial court, which included two of the most serious aggravators (i.e., HAC and CCP).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 218 So. 3d 428 - Guerry Wayne Hertz v. Julie L. Jones, etc.