Curry v. State

¶1 Affirmed. See Baugh v. State, 961 So.2d 198, 204 (Fla.2007) (“There is sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction if, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”); T.H. v. State, 899 So.2d 504 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (holding that sufficient evidence established that automobile recovered was same automobile stolen from victim).