18 So. 3d 37 - Cable v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on New Jersey v. T. L. O. · Hudson v. Michigan · Wilson v. Arkansas · Benefield v. State · 211 So. 2d 79 - Urquhart v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“IN VIEW OF THE ABROGATION OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE FOR FOURTH AMENDMENT KNOCK-AND-ANNOUNCE VIOLATIONS, SHOULD THE JUDICIAL REMEDY OF EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE BE APPLIED FOR VIOLATIONS OF FLORIDA’S STATUTORY KNOCK-AND-ANNOUNCE PROVISIONS?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Fernandez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.