18 So. 3d 833 - Brooks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 983 So. 2d 270 - Hughes v. State · 206 So. 2d 200 - Bucklew v. State · 594 So. 2d 17 - Hutchinson v. State · 884 So. 2d 733 - Green v. State · 531 So. 2d 627 - Rowland v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An attempt to commit a crime consists of three elements: (1) an intent to commit a particular crime, (2) a direct ineffectual act done toward its commission, and (3) the failure to consummate its commission.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“A person is guilty of aggravated assault if he (i) attempts to cause serious bodily injury to another, or causes such injury purposely, knowingly or recklessly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life; [or] (ii) attempts to cause or purposely or knowingly causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon or other means likely to produce death or serious bodily harm ....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“There is no intent requirement in the reckless-driving statute, which simply criminalizes driving a vehicle in a manner that indicates a wilful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property. Miss.Code Ann. § 63-3-1201 (Rev. 2004). Therefore, the evidence to support a verdict of guilt of reckless driving does not necessarily prove guilt of aggravated assault, under Rowland, because a conviction for aggravated assault requires proof of intent. Rowland, 531 So.2d at 631-32.[ 2 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kelly v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.