Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 SW3D 11 - State v. Anderson

State v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Florida · Wardius v. Oregon · Baldwin v. New York Williams · State v. Mansfield · State v. Williamson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court, in considering a request for sanction for failure to disclose an alibi, should consider all of the pertinent circumstances, including any prejudice to the state from failure to make disclosure. In this case, when the state moved for sanction, it would have been more appropriate for the court to inquire more specifically of the defense exactly what testimony the defendant intended to present as to his whereabouts, including the specific location, the identity of other persons present and the nature of any corroboration to be offered. The court could then have inquired of the state what it would have differently if it had received seasonable notice. If the court had determined that any prejudice to the state was negligible, the court would, in our view, have done well to deny the request for sanction altogether.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “true alibi witness at all because, even if believed, [their] testimony does not show that [Parker] was not present at the scene of the crime”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he term `alibi' in common parlance frequently seems to anticipate the presentation of testimony by witnesses other than the accused,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.